<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toward a Holistic Cosmology of the Planetary Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergent-culture.com/towards-a-universal-cosmology-of-the-planetary-culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergent-culture.com/towards-a-universal-cosmology-of-the-planetary-culture/</link>
	<description>Making Sense of the Human - Planetary Condition: Demystifying the Past, Unraveling the Present &#38; Anticipating the Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:26:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohaan</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/towards-a-universal-cosmology-of-the-planetary-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-12290</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=4745#comment-12290</guid>
		<description>Regarding the 260 day cycle. There are a few examples of it. It&#039;s  simply very difficult to detect but self-existing nonetheless in various ways. In near future reports I will share  the known examples of the 260 day cycle as well as a system to detect its presence. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the 260 day cycle. There are a few examples of it. It&#039;s  simply very difficult to detect but self-existing nonetheless in various ways. In near future reports I will share  the known examples of the 260 day cycle as well as a system to detect its presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elec_Universe</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/towards-a-universal-cosmology-of-the-planetary-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-12045</link>
		<dc:creator>Elec_Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=4745#comment-12045</guid>
		<description>260 day Tzolkin cycle 
 
Perhaps one possible answer to the mystery of the 260 day Tzolkin cycle could be the simplest answer.  The earths &quot;year&quot; (orbit) has changed in length over time. 
 
The old civilisations have left records of the length of the time it took the earth to go round the sun and they all vary.  For cultures to build the amazing structures they did but not be able to record accurately how many days it takes the earth to go round the sun is not possible. For them to record different totals means that the earths orbit has changed.  They were not recording the length of a &quot;belief year&quot; but the physical year. 
 
How can the Earths orbit not just change once but slowly change?  In a Gravity Universe that scientists tell us we live in this is not possible but then again a stable planetary Newtonian system is also impossible but that does not stop them and us believing we are in one. Gravity is the weakest out of the natural forces yet is suppose to control the Universe. 
 
There is a growing idea called the Electric Universe theory that believes electricity rules the universe, especially through space plasma. Plasma is electrically charged gas. All the stars and our Sun are made of Plasma and &quot;Space&quot; is plasma. Around 99% of our universes mass is plasma. The unmeasurable, unseen, undetectable made up to balance the scientific books idea of Dark Energy and Dark Matter supposedly count for 96% of the Universe. Could we already have found this missing energy and mass? 
 
In what sort of job could you get something 95% wrong (5% correct) and be still believed and funded after making up something like Dark Energy? Yet some of the ideas in this website will be considered lunatic or crazy! 
 
And of the 260 day Tzolkin cycle and the length of the year? Maybe it was 260 days in their time but the Solar Systems electrical circuit and energy then changes and to balance out the planets orbits move slightly. This could also account for our &quot;ice ages&quot; and &quot;hot ages&quot;. 
 
But then again 260 is a magical number and there is power in numbers and frequencies. They may have chosen this number due to those reasons. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>260 day Tzolkin cycle</p>
<p>Perhaps one possible answer to the mystery of the 260 day Tzolkin cycle could be the simplest answer.  The earths &quot;year&quot; (orbit) has changed in length over time.</p>
<p>The old civilisations have left records of the length of the time it took the earth to go round the sun and they all vary.  For cultures to build the amazing structures they did but not be able to record accurately how many days it takes the earth to go round the sun is not possible. For them to record different totals means that the earths orbit has changed.  They were not recording the length of a &quot;belief year&quot; but the physical year.</p>
<p>How can the Earths orbit not just change once but slowly change?  In a Gravity Universe that scientists tell us we live in this is not possible but then again a stable planetary Newtonian system is also impossible but that does not stop them and us believing we are in one. Gravity is the weakest out of the natural forces yet is suppose to control the Universe.</p>
<p>There is a growing idea called the Electric Universe theory that believes electricity rules the universe, especially through space plasma. Plasma is electrically charged gas. All the stars and our Sun are made of Plasma and &quot;Space&quot; is plasma. Around 99% of our universes mass is plasma. The unmeasurable, unseen, undetectable made up to balance the scientific books idea of Dark Energy and Dark Matter supposedly count for 96% of the Universe. Could we already have found this missing energy and mass?</p>
<p>In what sort of job could you get something 95% wrong (5% correct) and be still believed and funded after making up something like Dark Energy? Yet some of the ideas in this website will be considered lunatic or crazy!</p>
<p>And of the 260 day Tzolkin cycle and the length of the year? Maybe it was 260 days in their time but the Solar Systems electrical circuit and energy then changes and to balance out the planets orbits move slightly. This could also account for our &quot;ice ages&quot; and &quot;hot ages&quot;.</p>
<p>But then again 260 is a magical number and there is power in numbers and frequencies. They may have chosen this number due to those reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

