<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the Tzolkin as Cosmocycle: God As A Universal Cyclical Process: ARTSOS 6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/</link>
	<description>Making Sense of the Human - Planetary Condition: Demystifying the Past, Unraveling the Present &#38; Anticipating the Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 03:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emergent Culture &#8211; The Art and Science of Synchronicity Investigates 11:11 and 11-11-11</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-62591</link>
		<dc:creator>Emergent Culture &#8211; The Art and Science of Synchronicity Investigates 11:11 and 11-11-11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 07:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-62591</guid>
		<description>[...] Introducing the Cosmocycle: God as a Universal Cyclical Process.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Introducing the Cosmocycle: God as a Universal Cyclical Process.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-29629</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-29629</guid>
		<description>This explains a lot!   ..Einstein said that he wanted to know the mind of God.  This pattern you describe, whether premeditated or made manifest by some cosmological fluke, is none the less a pattern that enables consciousness some thing to observe, or upon to consruct experience (illusory as it may be) in (at least) the 3D relam.  
....brilliant, Rohann, simply brilliant. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This explains a lot!   ..Einstein said that he wanted to know the mind of God.  This pattern you describe, whether premeditated or made manifest by some cosmological fluke, is none the less a pattern that enables consciousness some thing to observe, or upon to consruct experience (illusory as it may be) in (at least) the 3D relam. </p>
<p>&#8230;.brilliant, Rohann, simply brilliant. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohaan Solare</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-28800</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohaan Solare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-28800</guid>
		<description>Let me put it this way... why do you assign &quot;God&quot; a gender and where does one draw the line between &quot;coherent universal energy&quot; and its patterns and the universe. To me they are a single entity with many manifestations. And I repeat I personally do not find the concept of &quot;God&quot; the least bit useful except when referring to popular notions of God and when trying to bridge the ideological chasm between vague and ill defined popular God concepts and more &quot;concrete&quot; empirically validated ideas where one might apply the idea of God for conversational reasons.  
 
To create artificial divisions where none exist is what is meant by dualist. You would be surprised to the extent to which our culture programs our thinking. While you may not believe in Judeo Christian dcotrine per se your statements retain vestiges of Judeo-Christian ideology. Judeo-Christian thought forms the ideological foundation of other western schools of thought.  The rationalists of the enlightenment believed in the separation between mind and body. Here is a classic example of non-religious Western thinkers making statements about human beings that have been proven untrue. The Western mind is adept at creating divisions where non exist. And that&#039;s because its been drilled into peoples heads for thousands of years that God is separate from nature. &quot;Us and them&quot; is a classic separatist Western idea. 
 
 Scientists are not even immune from this phenomena. I ask you to review my article &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/3JNJR2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Toward a Balanced Worldview: Order out of Chaos &amp; the Emergence of a Holistic Science.&lt;/a&gt; for further elaboration. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me put it this way&#8230; why do you assign &quot;God&quot; a gender and where does one draw the line between &quot;coherent universal energy&quot; and its patterns and the universe. To me they are a single entity with many manifestations. And I repeat I personally do not find the concept of &quot;God&quot; the least bit useful except when referring to popular notions of God and when trying to bridge the ideological chasm between vague and ill defined popular God concepts and more &quot;concrete&quot; empirically validated ideas where one might apply the idea of God for conversational reasons.  </p>
<p>To create artificial divisions where none exist is what is meant by dualist. You would be surprised to the extent to which our culture programs our thinking. While you may not believe in Judeo Christian dcotrine per se your statements retain vestiges of Judeo-Christian ideology. Judeo-Christian thought forms the ideological foundation of other western schools of thought.  The rationalists of the enlightenment believed in the separation between mind and body. Here is a classic example of non-religious Western thinkers making statements about human beings that have been proven untrue. The Western mind is adept at creating divisions where non exist. And that&#039;s because its been drilled into peoples heads for thousands of years that God is separate from nature. &quot;Us and them&quot; is a classic separatist Western idea. </p>
<p> Scientists are not even immune from this phenomena. I ask you to review my article <a href="http://bit.ly/3JNJR2" rel="nofollow">Toward a Balanced Worldview: Order out of Chaos &amp; the Emergence of a Holistic Science.</a> for further elaboration. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unstated</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-28788</link>
		<dc:creator>unstated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-28788</guid>
		<description>Wow, you have done a lot of judging of me from one comment.  Dualist, self contradictory. ???? 
No my god is not of Judeo Christian design.  I deprogrammed that many years ago. You are 100% wrong and seems like you missed the point. God is the coherent universal energy that connects everything, but are you claiming that he is also the pattern that the Universe manifests? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you have done a lot of judging of me from one comment.  Dualist, self contradictory. ????</p>
<p>No my god is not of Judeo Christian design.  I deprogrammed that many years ago. You are 100% wrong and seems like you missed the point. God is the coherent universal energy that connects everything, but are you claiming that he is also the pattern that the Universe manifests? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohaan Solare</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-28682</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohaan Solare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-28682</guid>
		<description>To use your definition of god as &quot;Coherent universal energy that connects every thing&quot;. Energy and matter are one and the same the &quot;connective tissues&quot;(gravity, weak &amp; strong nuclear forces and electromagnetism) are also finer energy-matter entities. Where does one draw the line and say this &quot;God connects everything&quot; and it&#039;s also made out of energy but it is is also &quot;mutually exclusive from the pattern or order&quot;. The pattern or order is the behavior of energy-matter.  Not only is your  statement dualist, but it is also self contradictory. Your version of God seems to be of Judeo Christian design. Judeo Christian thought believes in a God separate from &quot;his&quot; creation and as anyone can see the Judeo-Christian Culture complex has made a mess of Biblical proportions on this planet. That&#039;s what we get from a culture that believes in a God separate from nature. Essentially Judeo-Christian thought is a reflection of maladapted and traumatized psyche that then goes on to rationalize a universe through dysfunctional lenses. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To use your definition of god as &quot;Coherent universal energy that connects every thing&quot;. Energy and matter are one and the same the &quot;connective tissues&quot;(gravity, weak &amp; strong nuclear forces and electromagnetism) are also finer energy-matter entities. Where does one draw the line and say this &quot;God connects everything&quot; and it&#039;s also made out of energy but it is is also &quot;mutually exclusive from the pattern or order&quot;. The pattern or order is the behavior of energy-matter.  Not only is your  statement dualist, but it is also self contradictory. Your version of God seems to be of Judeo Christian design. Judeo Christian thought believes in a God separate from &quot;his&quot; creation and as anyone can see the Judeo-Christian Culture complex has made a mess of Biblical proportions on this planet. That&#039;s what we get from a culture that believes in a God separate from nature. Essentially Judeo-Christian thought is a reflection of maladapted and traumatized psyche that then goes on to rationalize a universe through dysfunctional lenses. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unstated</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-28658</link>
		<dc:creator>unstated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-28658</guid>
		<description>I can agree that God is the coherent universal energy that connects everything, but mutually exclusive from the &quot;pattern&quot; or &quot;order&quot; that it takes, being what you claim is the Tzolkin. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can agree that God is the coherent universal energy that connects everything, but mutually exclusive from the &quot;pattern&quot; or &quot;order&quot; that it takes, being what you claim is the Tzolkin. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohaan Solare</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-28656</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohaan Solare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-28656</guid>
		<description>No... I am not claiming that the Tzolkin cycle is God. I do not find the term useful and that is why it is only mentioned once in the title and once in the body, but for those who do use the term then the Tzolkin cycle is likely the best candidate to describe a &quot;veritable God&quot; if one finds such a term useful. To know that we live in a self-organizing universe that follows a predefined cyclical order is understanding enough for me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230; I am not claiming that the Tzolkin cycle is God. I do not find the term useful and that is why it is only mentioned once in the title and once in the body, but for those who do use the term then the Tzolkin cycle is likely the best candidate to describe a &quot;veritable God&quot; if one finds such a term useful. To know that we live in a self-organizing universe that follows a predefined cyclical order is understanding enough for me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unstated</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-28654</link>
		<dc:creator>unstated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-28654</guid>
		<description>Are you claiming the the Tzolkin is God???? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you claiming the the Tzolkin is God???? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7imix</title>
		<link>http://emergent-culture.com/introducing-the-cosmocycle-god-as-a-universal-cyclical-process/comment-page-1/#comment-28557</link>
		<dc:creator>7imix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergent-culture.com/?p=6833#comment-28557</guid>
		<description>Beautiful post. Thank you. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful post. Thank you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

