Synchronicity
Written by Rohaan Solare on Sunday, September 13, 2009 15:53 - 3 Comments
Contrasting the Western Worldview of Objects with the Native American Worldview of Relationships: ARTSOS pt. 4
Series Title: The Tzolkin Code and the Art and Science of Synchronicity: A New way to See and Experience the World. ARTSOS Part 4
An Old, but New View of Time and the “Universal Order” according to Native Americans

Models of atoms for 3 of 92 naturally occuring elements.
We have been taught that the everything in the universe is made of things called atoms, which in turn are made of still smaller “sub-atomic” particles.
I will affirm that our world is constructed of theoretical things called atoms, but Western science with its fixation on objects and reductionist approach to nature has literally missed the bigger picture.
When we look at the phenomenal world we see objects or clumps of organized atoms in motion. The Western mind has fixated upon the objects themselves to try and understand the most fundamental properties of the universe.
Below are three excerpts from an article covering a meeting between various academics as they discuss the essential difference between Western and Native American views of reality. The article link is found at the end of this report.
[Nancy Maryboy, Ph.D., a Dine/Cherokee cosmologist from Arizona says; "the Western view looks at ego, self and the boundaries between self and other while Native languages talk about relationships and process. That's why Native people introduce themselves by clan"
Another significant difference is that Native languages are verb based, while English is structured on nouns".]
The laws of motion form the foundation of Western physics. Western science has simply failed to discover the underlying order inherent in the periodicity or circularity of motion due to its obsession with things (nouns) versus the process (verbs) of things.
["Nouns are snapshots of a flowing reality," Alford said. A person from a noun-based language such as English is programmed to watch dancers, he explained, while a person with a verb-based perspective would see or feel the experience of dancing.]
No Word for Time
The Western idea of time has no correspondence in pre-colonial Americas. Western academics
cannot even agree on a definition of time.
From my vantage point time and movement are one and the same.
Without movement we cannot measure time. Our sense of time is derived from the revolution or spin movement of our earth. A day can be described as 24 segments of movement we call hours or 1440 segments called minutes or 84,400 segments called seconds and so on.
Time in the modern Western world has become mechanized as movement divided into segments according to clocks designed to keep pace with the earths rotation. In clock free societies a day-night cycle is the fundamental unit of time (movement).
Enter the Cellular Automata
The noun encultured thinking of the Western mind has great difficulty with the concept of time and is perhaps one of the fundamental reasons why Western physics cannot relate all of its theoretical things into a clean and simple understanding of how the universe is fundamentally constituted and organized.
According to the renowned physicist Roger Penrose, physics is in a quandary and in need of large scale revision. It would be too much work to break down the Western scientific worldview of the most fundamental strata of reality–Quantum Mechanics, so instead I will describe the Meso-American worldview of the cosmos.
In doing so I will present an elegant and verifiable cosmology capable of describing reality at every scale of the energy-matter continuum. It would then be a matter of adapting Western physics concepts to a model that does describe reality at every level.
There exists a Western physics model known as Digital Physics theory and it very closely resembles the Meso-American model of

The cellular automata of the Digital Physics model of reality. A self propagating and evolving model of CA. A program with a few basic instructions that begins to bear a resemblance to how systems self-organize, grow, adapt and evolve. http://www.alexandria.nu/ai/machine_vision/bubbles/
reality codified as the 260 day Tzolkin Cycle. Digital Physics is not some fringe theory either as it seems to be gaining adherents and is already well regarded by some very well known physicists including the Nobel laureate Gerard T’ Hooft.
So what I am describing is not as radical or outlandish as it may seem.
An obvious question arises.
How could a pre-techological culture ascertain the invisible structure and organization of reality?
One of the challenges posed by Quantum Mechanics (QM) is that physicists don’t know how to show or describe the workings of QM at our every day level of reality. They resort to classical physics to describe our everyday world.
There exists a significant linguistic and theoretical chasm between the world described by QM and our every day experience of the world. The universe is a seamless continuum of energy-matter configurations. Therefore any theory of the most fundamental strata of reality must also describe the everyday world of human scaled events.
The ancient Meso-Americans did not know about the existence of the microscopic world. But they did understand the workings of macroscopic world better than any other culture.
Their knowledge of astronomy up until the invention of the telescope was unparalleled in the world. Meso-American astro-calendrical science is still the most comprehensive knowledge base of celestial movements and their categorization.
Western calendrics starts and ends with the artificial and ridiculously constructed Gregorian calendar. Not that Meso-American astro-calendrical science is beyond the understanding of Western science, but for some reason astro-calendrical science has not been developed in the West.
Perhaps this situation is due to the fact that Western calendrics has remained the province of the outdated institution that devised it–the Roman Catholic Church. There are at best a few hundred people worldwide who understand the depth and intricacy of Maya-Meso-American Calendrics (MMAC)

The Cellular Automata of the Tzolkin Code and Cycle.
The Tzolkin Code is understood by even fewer people. In fact I know of only one published researcher who has described the Tzolkin Code in any kind of systematic detail. It is quite likely that my description of the Tzolkin Code is perhaps one of a handful of intensive investigations into Tzolkin Dynamics.
My work on the Tzolkin is based on the Argüellen interpretation. Jenkins and Calleman, perhaps the two most widely recognized names in Maya studies, have not produced any work that I am aware of describing the Tzolkin in scientific detail.
We owe our ignorance of Meso-American calendrical science to the genocidal and cultural imperialism of the Judeo-Christian Culture Complex. The invading Spanish managed to burn all but four Mayan manuscripts. Those surviving the genocide where then forced to abandon their worldview for the artificial Judeo-Christian worldview of reality.
“The Great and Venerable Mechanism of the Universe”
Back to the question of Meso-American knowledge of the fundamental and universal order of reality. By observing the macroscopic realm the Meso-Americans discovered cycles in the movement of the stars and planets.
They also discovered cycles in the movement and quality of nature inclusive of human social reality. These cycles are encoded in the 260 day Tzolkin cycle. They mapped and charted what they could see with the naked eye.

Those interested in another physics model that also seems to relate to the 260 unit Tzolkin may want to review Garret Lisi's 248 unit "Simple Theory of Everything".
The Meso-American Tzolkin Code is equivalent to the highly sought after physics “Theory of Everything”. The Tzolkin Code is “the order of the universe” according to the Meso-Americans.
If indeed the Tzolkin Code charts natural cycles and rhythms then those cycles must by logical and physical necessity emerge from the invisible realm.
It is the express purpose of the my work on the Art and Science Science of Synchronicity(ARTSOS) to relate the Tzolkin Code to our understanding of physics, chemistry and genetics. Part 2 of the SOS has already begun that work.
Tzolkin is a Mayan word meaning “the sequence or count of days”. Not a very telling phrase given the social and scientific import I attribute to the Tzolkin. Other Meso-American nations such as the Aztecs had their own word to mean more or less the same.
The Aztec term for their calendrical version of the Tzolkin is “teoilhuicatl apaluaztli ollin tonal machiotl” and gives us a much more revealing clue into the magnificence encoded by the Tzolkin. The Aztec phrase means The Great and Venerable Mechanism of the Universe. My ten year study of the Tzolkin Code compels me to acknowledge the grandiose name as fitting.
Introducing Einsteins Piper
Movement and Measure
In the cosmology of ancient Meso-America the universe is constituted of two fundamental properties they call movement and measure. Movement is self explanatory and equivalent to time and measure pertains to periodicity or the cyclical nature of movement.
In other words all things move and they do so in predetermined ways. A cycle is a fixed quality and quantity of movement. A cycle of movement can also be described as pulsation, oscillation or wave.
Things move and they do so according to a fixed period of time or movement. The foregoing is what Einstein meant when he said…
Everything is determined, the beginning as well as the end, by forces over which we have no control. It is determined for insects as well as for the stars, human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune, intoned in the distance by an invisible piper”.
By “dance”, Einstein means movement and by “tune”, he means rhythm or periodicity.
The “invisible piper“ is what religions and spiritualists call God or one of the many other names meaning more or less the same. It is what the Greek philosophers meant by the word cosmos–the order of the Universe. In this sense God is an acronym for Galactic Ordering Dynamic.

Hunabku, a symbol representing our galaxy's center according to the Maya. Hunabku means the one giver of movement and measure.
Everything in our galaxy revolves around the galactic center and everything does so in a fixed and predetermined or cyclical way.
Western physics understands “the dance” well, but it has missed the rhythm and beat of nature.
To understand the rhythm and beat of nature we must turn to the Meso-American understanding of time as encoded by the Tzolkin [continued in part 5 of The Art and Science of Synchronicity: Introducing Einsteins Piper, the Tzolkin Code Unveiled.]
Scientists, linguists and Native leaders gather to explore different world views
3 Comments
I find the Hunabku very interesting as it reminds me of the Yin/Yang symbol. They are both balanced circles, with the light within the dark and the dark within the light. Oneness of everything, in other words.
And I found the idea of noun- versus verb-based language/culture enlightening. As an SGI Buddhist, I interpret that as being focused on the cause, rather than fixated by the effect. And the former is a far more creative way to live.
Thank you very much for the food for thought you have given me!
Lunda
I’m finding this very much interesting. Like Alexandra Innes, except i’m not a Buddhist, i find in your exposition many affinities with great Knowledge traditions that I heard about (except that i never went deep in any).
And I also found immediate similarity Hunabku and the symbol of Yin-Yang.
Also, I understand that there is dance and no dancers; “things” are temporary illusions generated by the dance of energy.
I feel that the concept of Time, as you say, is likely to be the thing blocking the advances to a unified understanding of the ineffable Whole, beyond all concepts.
Being a Western, though, i am puzzled by the existence of what is called “dark matter” (another universe?) that constitutes about 90 % of known universe.
Thank you for your inspired view of such a little know of this non Western civilization and its contribute for a new level of global awareness.
Leave a Reply
- Introducing the Cosmocycle: God as a Universal Cyclical Process
- Toward a Holistic Cosmology of the Planetary Culture
- Origins of Mayan Calendar Confusion and 2012 Mania–Separating Fact from Fantasy
- Plato’s Cave Revisited: The Cave Walls of Culture
- The Tzolkin Code and The Science of Synchronicity: A New Way to See and Experience the World. ARTSOS pt.1
- The Grandest Illusion: Our Culture, Our Inheritance, Our Burden
- The Distinctions between Natural and Artificial Calendar Systems: One Enlightens; the Latter Enslaves
- Transitioning to a Planetary Culture: Trend Convergence and the Case for Socio-Cultural Transformation
- The Delusions, the Deluders and “the Truth”
- 74 percent of the Strongest Earthquakes in the last 11 months concurred with Tzolkin Cycle Hyper-Days
- Critical Junctures, Solar Cycle 2012 and the Global Predicament
- Science of Synchronicity: Self-Organizing Systems from Atoms to Humanity. ARTSOS pt. 2
- Prophecy Demystified: The Non-Existent “Mayan Prophecies” and the Real Meaning of “Prophecy”
- Gender Balance as a Prerequisite to a Healthy and Just Society: The 12 Most Remarkable Women of the 20th Century






(5.00 out of 5) - Beyond Jung: The Building Blocks of Synchronicity, the Cosmos, Life & Human Social Reality






(5.00 out of 5) - A Movement to Unite All Good Will Movements






(5.00 out of 5) - Emergent Culture as Regenerative Dynamic of Culture






(5.00 out of 5) - The Achilles Heel of Society and the Kings of Exploitation






(5.00 out of 5) - The Mayan Calendar and Dec. 21, 2012: The Facts, the Fiction and the Marvels






(5.00 out of 5) - Naomi Klein explains how “We won’t pay for your crisis!”– Or Will We?






(5.00 out of 5) - The Grandest Illusion: Our Culture, Our Inheritance, Our Burden






(5.00 out of 5) - Prophecy Demystified: The Non-Existent “Mayan Prophecies” and the Real Meaning of “Prophecy”






(5.00 out of 5) - The Tzolkin Code and The Science of Synchronicity: A New Way to See and Experience the World. ARTSOS pt.1






(5.00 out of 5)
Member Login
Meta
Bird Feed...
- .@wow_trees Imagine then what we work out. 18 hrs ago
- R.T @wow_trees: Einstein worked out his theory of relativity without the internet either. :) 18 hrs ago
- The Russian Gov't's aspirations are no different than than those of the US Gov't. 18 hrs ago
- On the Trail of the SuperOrganism, The Question of 2012 and the Marvel of Maya Calendrics http://bit.ly/6jBf23 18 hrs ago
- The Coming Boom in Civic Virtue http://bit.ly/4FrFAx 18 hrs ago
- Fomenting the Necessary Revolution http://bit.ly/3qZ2Ni 18 hrs ago
- War is criminal but the Sane do not make the laws. 18 hrs ago
- A Step towards a War-free World: Criminalise War http://bit.ly/4z04ym 18 hrs ago
- Ghandi kicked the British Empire out of India using Non Violence Civil Disobedience & NonCooperation and without the use of twitter 18 hrs ago
- More updates...
Posting tweet...
Powered by Twitter Tools








Well, this is certainly nice to see, but it seems to me that the “Digital Physics” part seems to be missing the mark again. I went to read the linked article above (not all of it, but about half), and they’re still looking at the universe as some object outside themselves.
In my language, we don’t say “Creator”, we don’t even say “Creation”, though that’s a very very loose translation that’s not very accurate. Gisul’g ([GK]ee-sool’g) is the name for all of this, that’s both inside and out, and it means “creating, moving, doing” (more or less). Note the verb and not noun (it’s in Mi’kmaq), action not object. The universe is you, and you are the universe. Even when you don’t move, “it” moves. Even when you’re not moving, you’re moving inside, both your organs and your spirit, emotions, mind.
FYI, sometimes you’ll see “Nisgam” for “Creator”, in Mi’kmaq, that’s not very accurate, since it can mean ‘spirit’, or ‘great spirit’. That’s a Christianisation, as the Catholics got to us pretty early on.
I don’t know my language enough to get into it more, but that’s all.