economicstruth.com

like noam chomsky says, it begins with language. maybe that can be the first item on the agenda as far as making some real changes i’ve been trying=not really trying to reconceptualize my notions of language and change the ways i employ it.

my degree is in biology (heavy evolutionary and molecular components along with philsophical). when i entered school i was sure it would be mostly useless lol. i’m also in law school now, so i have some knowledge of the legal field.

consider this an offer of my humble skill set — from ‘me’ to ‘us’ — to whomever has a way to use it to further our collective eusocial goals.

oh and before i forget…replicate this meme: when the dollar collapses, don’t go nuts or rebel…just trade. why do we need currency in the first place? as long as we can grow food, filter water, and defend ourselves, we more as self-sufficient than any bank that’s for sure. better yet…coin your own temporary currency.

it’s all funny money anyway so you might as well use it to your advantage.

and finally remember…we’re all tit-for-tat-ers at heart. if you approach literally any stranger with a smile and a handshake…you’ll get one in return every single time.. same goes for a rough look or a reach for the weapon.

Logan (somewhere between enlightenment, insanity, and illiteracy)

http://www.educationfutures.com/2009/12/13/settlers-of-the-shift/

The rational only means one’s ability to “make sense of” or to “add up and sum” based only upon with what one is working with. The liability in giving too much weight to one’s rationalities is the assumption that one has all the information to make an accurate and final assessment. The agnostic disposition of Robert Anton Wilson says that one models reality the best one can with available information and ability, but one should remain open to new information b/c the development of knowledge assures us that new information will always be forth coming and it will always have a bearing on our model of reality. New information will either confirm, negate or modify aspects of our model. At the end of your comment you end by saying that you are open to the possibility and that makes all the difference in the world.

There are thousands of organizations and movements working on hundreds of issues. And while they have common enemy, they can’t get along that easy. There are to many differences and different points of view on the same situation, to make all of them cooperate. And even if that was possible, we shouldn’t rule out all those that are just staging on the just scene for the interest of the capitalism. E.G. I’d guess that at least half of environmental organizations are actually undercover fighting for the dark side.

But I’m a passionate being as well, and I won’t let all this put me off.